CULTURE MEDIA AND SPORT

Broadcasting Programmes: Scots Gaelic Language

Angus MacNeil: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport when the new Gaelic television channel is expected to commence transmission.

David Lammy: A precise date has not yet been set. However, we hope the new Gaelic digital service, providing a vastly improved service to the Gaelic-speaking community not only in its heartlands of the Highlands and Islands, but across Scotland, will be launched as soon as is practicable.

Departments: Sick Leave

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what percentage of sick leave taken by staff in his Department was stress-related in each of the last three years.

David Lammy: The percentage of stress-related sick leave taken by staff in the last three financial years is as follows:
	
		
			   Percentage of sick leave 
			 2004-05 3 
			 2005-06 10.5 
			 2006-07 13 
		
	
	The Department has been improving the way in which it monitors and records sickness absence.
	As part of our attendance, health and welfare programme for staff, we have a range of policies in place to reduce stress. These include: a stress management policy; a revised sickness absence policy; a full range of flexible working patterns to support work-life balance; an on-site gym and yoga classes.
	The Department also launched the employee assistance programme in April 2007, which includes a confidential advisory service and counselling service for all staff.
	We will also be undertaking a stress audit at the end of 2007, beginning of 2008.

DEFENCE

Army: Reserve Forces

Ann Winterton: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the present strength is of the Army Volunteer Reserve.

Adam Ingram: The present strength of the Army Volunteer Reserve (Territorial Army) as at 1 March 2007 is 35,700. This figure includes Mobilised Territorial Army and Officer Training Corps, but excludes full-time reserve service personnel and non-regular permanent staff.

Army: Reserve Forces

Ann Winterton: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the 1 April 2007 data will be available under heading TSP07 Strength of all Services Reserves and Cadets on the Defence Analytical Service Agency website.

Adam Ingram: "TSP7 UK Reserves and Cadets Strengths at 1 April 2007" will be published on the Defence Analytical Services Agency website during September 2007. The actual date of publication will be pre-announced not less than two weeks prior to publication on the Office for National Statistics website in line with National Statistics protocols.

Ballistic Missile Defence

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library a copy of the missile defence feasibility study that was delivered to the NATO summit in Riga in 2006.

Des Browne: I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave on 26 June 2006,  Official Report, column 165W, to the hon. Member for North Devon (Nick Harvey).

Defence Equipment: Exhibitions

Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence 
	(1)  from which countries buyers  (a) have been and  (b) will be invited to the Defence Systems and Equipment International exhibition at the ExCel Centre in September;
	(2)  on which days the Defence Systems and Equipment International exhibition will be open to  (a) overseas customers,  (b) the press and  (c) the public; and what estimate he has made of the number of visitors expected at the event;
	(3)  what the estimated cost of the Defence Systems and Equipment International exhibition is to the public purse.

Adam Ingram: The full list of countries that will receive official invitations to Defence Systems and Equipment International is still being finalised. The Defence Export Services Organisation (DESO) intends to publish a list of those countries from which delegations are invited a day or so in advance of the exhibition opening, the timing being consistent with the security of guests. It is planned to place this list on the DESO internet site:
	www.deso.mod.uk
	The exhibition is organised by Reed Exhibitions Ltd. We understand it will be open to registered visitors including from overseas, and accredited media representatives between 11-14 September 2007. It will not be open to the general public. An estimate of the number of visitors likely to attend is a matter for the organisers.
	The costs of hosting official overseas delegations at DSEiO7 will largely be met by the organisers. The balance of these costs met from Defence funds is expected to be in the region of £120,000. Other MOD costs will be met from a number of budgets and an estimate of these cannot be centrally made. No estimate has been made of costs for which MOD is not responsible.

Departments: Assets

Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assets and resources have been disposed of by his Department in the last 10 years; and what revenues have been accrued as a result.

Adam Ingram: holding answer 26 June 2007
	Tens of thousands of individual fixed assets are disposed of annually, either as a result of changing requirements, upgrade or replacement programmes or where equipment has reached the end of its serviceable life. Information on all items disposed of could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
	Proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets were not held centrally before financial year 1999-2000. From 1999-2000 the figures are as follows:
	
		
			  Financial year  Proceeds (£) 
			 1999-2000 234,862,000 
			 2000-01 317,987,000 
			 2001-02 287,923,000 
			 2002-03 404,774,000 
			 2003-04 481,298,000 
			 2004-05 266,912,000 
			 2005-06 299,317,000

Departments: Non-departmental Public Bodies

Mark Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list his Department's  (a) Executive agencies,  (b) Executive non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs),  (c) tribunal NDPBs,  (d) advisory NDPBs,  (e) trading funds and  (f) public corporations for the current financial year.

Adam Ingram: The information is as follows:
	 Executive agencies
	Defence Analytical Services Agency
	Defence Medical Education and Training Agency
	Defence Storage and Distribution Agency
	Defence Vetting Agency
	Ministry of Defence Police and Guarding Agency
	People Pay and Pensions Agency
	Service Children's Education
	Service Personnel and Veterans Agency
	 Executive non-departmental public bodies
	National Army Museum
	RAF Museum
	Royal Naval Museum
	Royal Navy Submarine Museum
	Royal Marines Museum
	 Advisory non-departmental public bodies
	Advisory Committee on Conscientious Objectors
	Advisory Group on Medical Countermeasures
	Animal Welfare Advisory Committee
	Armed Forces Pay Review Body
	Central Advisory Committee on War Pensions
	Defence Nuclear Safety Committee
	Defence Scientific Advisory Council
	National Employer Advisory Board
	Nuclear Research Advisory Council
	Review Board for Government Contracts
	War Pensions Committees
	 Trading funds
	ABRO
	Defence Aviation Repair Agency
	Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
	Met Office
	UK Hydrographic Office
	 Public corporations
	Oil and Pipelines Agency
	Fleet Air Arm Museum

Departments: Northern Ireland

David Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library a copy of the concordat governing the relationship between his Department and the Northern Ireland administration.

Adam Ingram: No such concordat exists.
	The principles set out in the Memorandum of Understanding and Supplementary Agreements between the UK Government, Scottish Ministers, the Cabinet of the National Assembly for Wales and the Northern Ireland Executive, published in 2001, continue to underpin our working relationship with the Northern Ireland Executive.

RAF Brize Norton

Vincent Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library a copy of the Ministry of Defence regulations for civil aircraft use of RAF Brize Norton.

Des Browne: holding answer 26 June 2007
	Yes, once the regulations have been redacted to remove classified information.

Rendition

Vincent Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence on what dates aircraft HZ-124 has landed at RAF Brize Norton since 21 May 2007.

Des Browne: holding answer 26 June 2007
	It is not the practice of the Government to make public details of travel arrangements of foreign governments.

Rendition

Vincent Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 21 May 2007,  Official Report, column 1052W, on rendition, on which 14 dates aircraft HZ-124 landed at RAF Brize Norton between 1 July 2006 and 21 May 2007; and what the total amount is of the fees paid by the owner of HZ-124 to his Department for using RAF Brize Norton since 1 July 2006.

Des Browne: holding answer 26 June 2007
	It is not the practice of the Government to make public details of travel arrangements by foreign governments. The fees for the use of RAF Brize Norton by aircraft HZ-124 since 1 July 2006 were waived in accordance with the regulations in Chapter 7, Annex F of Joint Service Publication 360, which govern the waiver of charges for the use of military airfields by British and foreign civil and military aircraft.
	The hon. Member may also wish to note that my answer of the 21 May 2007,  Official Report, column 1053W, was incorrect and should have read:
	Since 1 July 2006, aircraft HZ 124 has landed 15 times at RAF Brize Norton. The aircraft operated in accordance with the MOD regulations for civil aircraft use of military airfields. The regulations also cover the applicability and level of landing, housing, parking and insurance fees charges. The regulations have been adhered to for each flight.

ENVIRONMENT FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS

Recycling

Andrew George: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 
	(1)  what research has been conducted by the Department and its agencies on  (a) the effectiveness of the Green Dot approach to recycling in the countries that have adopted this initiative and  (b) assessing its feasibility in the UK;
	(2)  what factors the Government take into account when deciding whether to adopt the Green Dot approach to recycling; and what assessment the Government have made of its use in other European Union member states.

Ben Bradshaw: holding answer s  27 June 2007
	No such research has been conducted and my Department has not carried out any assessments of the systems employed in other member states.
	The Green Dot system is used in several member states to transpose the requirements of the EU directive on packaging and packaging waste. The Green Dot is a licensed trademark which denotes compliance with an authorised packaging recovery scheme in other European Union member states. Its use indicates that a financial contribution has been paid to a national packaging recovery company, set up in accordance with the principles defined in the EU directive and the national law which transposes it.
	The Green Dot is not a recycling symbol, although is often misinterpreted as such, so should not be used to denote general recyclability or recycled content.
	The Green Dot system is not used in the UK; producer responsibility obligations are fulfilled via a different method. The management of packaging and packaging waste is covered by two sets of regulations in the UK, the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007 and the Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations 2003 (as amended). The packaging waste regulations require producers to buy packaging waste recovery notes (PRNs), or the export equivalent (PERNs), to demonstrate that they have financed a certain amount of recycling. Introducing a Green Dot system, therefore, would simply mean changing the system we have used in the UK to implement the provision of the packaging directive, rather than extending producer responsibility.
	The approach that has been taken by the UK is unique and was formulated and agreed with industry following the adoption of the EU directive on packaging and packaging waste.

Waste Disposal: Nappies

Madeleine Moon: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the potential contribution of reusable nappies to reductions in landfill material.

Ben Bradshaw: Disposable nappies form 2-3 per cent. of the household waste stream, approximately 400,000 tonnes per year.
	Reusable nappies may reduce demands on landfill but they still impact on the environment in other ways, such as the water and energy used in washing and drying them. In May 2005, the Environment Agency published a report entitled "A Life Cycle Assessment of disposable and reusable nappies in the UK". The report concluded that there was no significant difference between any of the environmental impacts of the disposable, home use reusable and commercial laundry systems that were assessed. None of the systems studied were more or less environmentally preferable.
	The DEFRA-funded Waste and Resources Action Programme's (WRAP) Real Nappy Campaign was established to promote the use of reusable nappies. The three-year campaign succeeded in diverting approximately 23,000 tonnes of biodegradable nappy waste from landfill in England.

Waste Disposal: Nappies

Madeleine Moon: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate his Department has made of  (a) the length of time required for a disposable nappy to fully decompose in landfill and  (b) the number of tonnes of (i) carbon dioxide, (ii) methane and (iii) other greenhouse gases which are emitted by landfill disposable nappies in each (A) first 10 years after disposal and (B) subsequent decade until total decomposition.

Ben Bradshaw: The Wisard software tool used by the Environment Agency in their report, "Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Nappies in the UK", assumed a 500 year time boundary for leachate in landfill. The Environment Agency therefore concluded that it would take that amount of time for the plastic part of a disposable nappy to decompose. The paper-fluff and faeces should take approximately 100 and 10 years respectively to degrade.
	My Department does not hold the information requested on the gases emitted by landfilled disposable nappies. However, the Environment Agency's report (available from their website and the Library of the House) does contain some information on the impacts of disposable nappies on global warming and the gases involved.

Waste Disposal: Nappies

Madeleine Moon: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate his Department has made of the annual volume of disposable nappies going to landfill in each of the last five years.

Ben Bradshaw: I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Romsey (Sandra Gidley) on 26 January 2007,  Official Report, column 2122W.

Waste Management

Martin Horwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 15 June 2007,  Official Report, column 1371W, on waste management, which measures his Department  (a) has introduced and  (b) plans to introduce that are specifically designed to reduce the amount of waste that the UK produces.

Ben Bradshaw: Waste Strategy for England 2007, published on 24 May 2007, sets out a range of measures which will drive the reduction of the amount of waste produced in England. Table 8.6 of the strategy summarises how these measures will help to drive waste reduction. Further detail is available throughout the strategy which is available on the DEFRA website and in the Library of the House.
	Waste management is a devolved matter and, in the rest of the United Kingdom, is the responsibility of the respective devolved Administrations.

Written Questions

Michael Spicer: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when he expects to respond to the letter from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire of 17 May to the Minister of State on recycling plants.

Ben Bradshaw: A reply was sent to the hon. Member on 20 June 2007. I apologise for the delay which occurred due to high volumes of correspondence received.

FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS

Cuba: Politics and Government

Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the political situation in Cuba.

Kim Howells: holding answer 28 June 2007
	The June EU Council Conclusions on Cuba reaffirmed the UK view that there have been no significant changes to the political, economic and social system in Cuba over the last year, despite the temporary transfer of power from Fidel to Raul Castro last July. The conclusions state that the Council
	"deplores that the human rights situation has not fundamentally changed"
	and observe that
	"the Cuban Government continues to deny its citizens internationally recognised civil, political and economic rights and freedoms".
	In response to this lack of change, UK/EU policy continues to be based on the 1996 EU Common Position, which states that the EU's main objective is to encourage a peaceful transition to pluralist democracy in Cuba. The UK/EU remains committed to a two-track policy of intensive dialogue with both the Cuban Government 'and' civil society in Cuba. We also continue to urge the Cuban Government to improve human rights standards in Cuba, including the unconditional release of all political prisoners.

Departments: Pay

Theresa May: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many bonuses were awarded to senior civil servants working in his Department and its agencies in each year between 1997 and 2001-02; and at what total cost.

Kim Howells: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office introduced performance-related bonus payments for staff in its senior management structure (senior civil service) in 2003-04. We did not pay bonuses to senior staff during the period from 1997 to 2001-02.

European Constitution Treaty

John Redwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many meetings involving UK  (a) officials and  (b) Ministers with (i) officials and (ii) Ministers of other EU countries were held to discuss the EU Amending treaty in the three months before 23 June 2007.

Kim Howells: My right hon. Friend the former Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair, my right hon. Friend the Member for Derby, South (Margaret Beckett), the former Foreign Secretary, my right hon. Friend the Member for Ashfield (Mr. Hoon), the former Minister for Europe and officials had numerous meetings with EU partners in the period leading up to the European Council. Discussions covered many areas, including EU institutional reform. My right hon. Friend the former Foreign Secretary's discussions included those with her EU counterparts at the 17-18 June General Affairs and External Relations Council, which considered a presidency report on EU institutional reform.

Iraq: Asylum

Andrew Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assistance has been given to Iraqi citizens who have provided interpretation services for official UK representatives in Iraq to  (a) enter and  (b) remain in the UK on grounds of their security; and how many Iraqis have been assisted in this way.

Kim Howells: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office does not hold a central record of applications for assistance to enter and remain in the UK on grounds of security, from Iraqi citizens who have provided interpretation services for UK representatives in Iraq. In order to answer my hon. Friend's question accurately, officials at all diplomatic posts, and some Departments in the UK, would be required to examine all their records since 2003, which would incur disproportionate cost.
	As I said in my response to the hon. Member for Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk (Mr. Moore) on 21 June 2007,  Official Report, column 2206W, in line with our policy worldwide, we do not comment on the substance of individual immigration or consular cases, and all applications are dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

HEALTH

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Health Services

Bill Etherington: To ask the Secretary of State for Health 
	(1)  what assessment his Department has made of the impact of the adequacy of specialist services for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis; and if he will make a statement;
	(2)  when  (a) he and  (b) officials in his Department last met representatives of the charities and organisations working on behalf of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis patients; and what matters were discussed.

Ivan Lewis: We have made no assessment of the impact of the adequacy of specialist services for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).
	We are not aware of any recent meetings by ministers or officials with representatives of charities and organisations working on behalf of those living with CFS/ME.

NHS: ICT

Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much Connecting for Health has paid Google for the sponsored link on Google's search engine; and which words or phrases in the search criteria bring up Connecting for Health as a sponsored link.

Caroline Flint: This link was established by a communications agency contracted to NHS Connecting for Health without authorisation and without consultation on the search criteria used. This was part of a wider programme of initiatives to improve communications about the Connecting for Health programme. The arrangement has been terminated. No costs have been borne by NHS Connecting for Health or indeed by the taxpayer.
	We are exploring with the agency concerned the circumstances under which this arrangement was made and the terms under which it operated, including the search criteria. We will write to the hon. Member when these inquiries are complete, and a copy will be placed in the Library.

Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust: Finance

Andrew George: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was allocated to the Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust in each of the last 10 years; and what the average allocation was to hospital trusts in England over the same period.

Ivan Lewis: Revenue allocations are made directly to primary care trusts (PCTs), not national health service trusts or individual hospitals. NHS trusts receive most of their income through the commissioning arrangements they have with PCTs.

HOME DEPARTMENT

Immigration Appeals

Nicholas Clegg: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the average time a Home Office presenting officer spent on  (a) a deportation appeal,  (b) an asylum appeal and  (c) an immigration appeal, excluding the time spent travelling and waiting for, and presenting, an appeal hearing was over the last 12 months.

Jacqui Smith: Over the last 12 months the average time spent by a presenting officer on an individual deportation appeal or an individual asylum appeal was three hours and thirty-six minutes. The average time spent by a presenting officer on an individual immigration appeal was one hour and thirty-six minutes. These figures exclude time spent travelling, waiting for and presenting appeal hearings. They represent the average preparation time spent by a presenting officer for each case type.
	It should be noted, however, that this is only an average time. Cases vary tremendously in their complexity, therefore Presenting Officers will spend whatever time is required to prepare a case to the necessary standard.

INNOVATION, UNIVERSITIES AND SKILLS

Higher Education: Trade Unions

Nick Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills on how many occasions he has met members of the University and College Union to discuss academic boycotts.

Bill Rammell: In the course of regular discussions with the University and College Union I have discussed academic boycotts and made clear the Government's opposition to them.

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CDC Capital Partners: Pensions

Julian Lewis: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what plans he has to provide guarantees for  (a) present and  (b) former employees of CDC that their pensions will be assured following any flotation or sale.

Douglas Alexander: DFID has no present plans for a flotation or sale of CDC.
	Pension benefits for current and former CDC employees are provided through the CDC pensions scheme. This is a conventional UK occupational pension scheme, established under trust and with its assets entirely separate from CDC. No payment can be made from the scheme to CDC, except in circumstances where the scheme is wound up, and a surplus exists after all benefits have been secured in full by the purchase of annuities.
	The most recent actuarial valuation was undertaken on 31 March 2006. This showed the scheme, although better funded than most UK pension schemes, to have a shortfall of assets against liabilities. Additional contributions are being paid by CDC to remove that shortfall. In addition, CDC has put aside significant additional assets in a contingent funding arrangement which safeguards the future payment of the shortfall contributions and provides materially improved security for the accrued benefits of scheme members.

Developing Countries: Sight Impaired

Tim Farron: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what discussions he has had with EU counterparts on improving the availability of accessible eye-care in developing countries.

Douglas Alexander: Neither I nor my predecessor have had any discussions with EU counterparts about improving the availability of accessible eye-care in developing countries.

JUSTICE

Asylum

David Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice on what date the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal notified the Home Office of the judge's decision in Tribunal Case VA/31440/2006 (FCO number 1198381), promulgated on 29 March, about the case of Mr. M.I. sponsored by Mr. R.A. of Aylesbury.

Gerry Sutcliffe: Information shows that the immigration judge decision was served to all parties on the 29 March 2007.
	In entry clearance and family visitor appeals the determination is served upon BIA who will arrange for the forwarding of the determination to the entry clearance post that made the original refusal.

National Offender Management Service

Lady Hermon: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much was spent on the National Offender Management Service in each year since its inception; and what the budget distribution was per region in each year.

Gerry Sutcliffe: The National Offender Management Service was created on 1 June 2004. The net resource outturn as recorded in the Home Office accounts, is as follows:
	
		
			   £ 
			 2004-05 (1)3,695,058,000 
			 2005-06 4,084,141,000 
			 2006-07 (2)4,342,070,000 
			 (1) Figures relate to the full year (2) Provisional subject to audit 
		
	
	Significant parts of the NOMS' budget are not distributed on a regional basis, and the local services may serve a wider catchment area than their geographical location, so a regional analysis of the overall NOMS budget cannot be achieved without disproportionate cost.

Peterborough Prison: Prisoners Release

Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what estimate he has made of the number of prisoners in HMP Peterborough who are likely to be released early; and if he will make a statement.

David Hanson: Figures for release are not available to be broken down by establishment.

Prisoners: Police Stations

Alan Williams: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 25 June to question 144968, on police cells costs, what range of nightly cost was used in calculating the £385 per night average cost; what the  (a) highest and  (b) lowest nightly invoice received so far is; and whether his Department is made aware of the cost per night before placing prisoners in police cells.

Gerry Sutcliffe: Police forces do not invoice nightly for Operation Safeguard expenses. The £385 per prisoner per night figure was calculated by applying experience of the costs of Operation Safeguard in 2002. Police forces may submit monthly, bi-monthly or consolidated invoices and the highest and lowest nightly invoices are therefore not centrally held.
	The actual cost of holding a prisoner under Operation Safeguard varies between forces.

LEADER OF THE HOUSE

Members: Pay

Jo Swinson: To ask the Leader of the House which hon. Members elected at the 2005 election are not drawing their salaries as hon. Members.

Harriet Harman: All current Members elected at the 2005 election are at present drawing their salary except for the five Sinn Fein MPs, none of whom have taken the Oath.

PRIME MINISTER

Accident and Emergency Departments: Closures

Theresa May: To ask the Prime Minister what plans he has to meet the Secretary of State for Health to discuss the closures of accident and emergency departments.

Gordon Brown: I shall be meeting all ministerial colleagues.

TRANSPORT

Community Railways Initiative

Stephen Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport 
	(1)  what progress has been made on each of the six pilots in the Community Rail Development Strategy;
	(2)  what progress has been made on identifying and separating out maintenance and renewal costs for community rail lines as envisaged in the Community Rail Development Strategy;
	(3)  what plans her Department has to implement the Community Rail Development Strategy;
	(4)  what progress has been made in increasing use of community rail lines as envisaged in the Community Rail Development Strategy.

Tom Harris: A review of the Community Rail Development Strategy, setting out progress in implementing the strategy and plans for further action, was published in March 2007. A copy is available in the House Library.

Railways: Freight

John Redwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what her policy is on single wagon marshalling for freight on the UK rail network.

Tom Harris: Freight operations on the UK rail network are a commercial matter for the private sector companies which operate the trains.

TREASURY

Members: Correspondence

Lady Hermon: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects to reply to the letter of 3 May 2007 from the hon. Member for North Down on the supply of a VAT number to Lighthouse Electrical in Donaghadee, County Down.

Dawn Primarolo: I replied to the hon. Lady on 26 June.

Taxation: Shipping

Cheryl Gillan: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much revenue HM Revenue and Customs received from businesses subject to incorrect Customs procedures codes being entered on export shipments of inward processing relief goods in each of the last five years for which figures are available.

Dawn Primarolo: HMRC advise me that to September 2006, errors have been identified involving 484 businesses. The total revenue involved amounts to £19.7 million customs duty and £81.9 million recoverable import VAT. Of the 484 confirmed cases, 203 have been granted remission from customs duty; following a departmental review by HMRC. This has remitted 564,000 of the £19.7 million customs duty.

WALES

Departments: Consultants

Michael Meacher: To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how much the Department spent on  (a) management consultants and  (b) other external consultants and advisers in each year since 2000; and which of these consultants undertook work for the Department with a total contractual value in excess of £10 million over this period.

Peter Hain: Since its inception in July 1999, the Wales Office has spent the following on external consultants.
	
		
			   £ 
			 2000-01 16,294 
			 2001-02 31,084 
			 2002-03 10,758 
			 2006-07 37,699 
		
	
	None of these consultants undertook work in excess of £10 million.

Departments: Domestic Visits

Cheryl Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what visits have been made by Wales Office Ministers to Welsh prisons; and what the dates of such visits were in the last 12 months.

Peter Hain: Prisons in Wales are the responsibility of the Ministry for Justice. Neither myself nor the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Wales has visited a Welsh prison in the last 12 months, but we have had discussions with ministerial colleagues about prison issues in Wales.

Departments: European Union

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many officials in his Department are  (a) involved in assisting European Council negotiations,  (b) involved in assisting and advising the European Commission,  (c) seconded to the European Commission,  (d) involved in monitoring EU decisions, communications, regulations and directives,  (e) involved in enforcing compliance with EU decisions, communications, regulations and directives and  (f) involved in other work related to the European Council, Commission or Court of Justice.

Peter Hain: Officials in the Economic and European Affairs Policy Branch of the Wales Office are involved to a limited degree in EU business. None work exclusively on EU business.

Driving: Insurance

Philip Hollobone: To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what discussions he has had with the Home Secretary on action taken by the police to identify uninsured drivers in Wales.

Peter Hain: I understand that the police make extensive use of insurance data made available through the Motor Insurers' Bureau to tackle the serious problem of uninsured driving. I understand that the latest figures indicate that 94.4 per cent. of all appropriate records are provided to the Motor Insurance Database within seven days. This is in line with expectations to meet the target of 95 per cent. of all appropriate records provided to the database within seven days by 1 January 2008.

Wales

Cheryl Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what visits he has made to Wales on ministerial business; and what the purpose and date of each visit was.

Peter Hain: Since becoming Secretary of State in 2002, I have always undertaken a busy programme of meetings, visits and functions with a wide range of organisations in Wales. It would require a disproportionate cost to identify and list all of the visits I have made, but specific examples are referred to in the Wales Office annual reports.

WORK AND PENSIONS

Jobseekers Allowance

Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 19 June 2007,  Official Report, column 1741W, on jobseeker's allowance, if he will provide equivalent data for 1997.

James Plaskitt: The available information has been placed in the Library.

New Deal for Young People

Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many participants there were in the New Deal for Young People in each month since 1998.

James Plaskitt: The available information is in the following table.
	
		
			  Participants on New Deal for Young People 
			  Month of  p articipation  Number of participants 
			 July 1998 102,490 
			 August 1998 112,800 
			 September 1998 120,050 
			 October 1998 126,090 
			 November 1998 129,940 
			 December 1998 133,130 
			 January 1999 138,490 
			 February 1999 141,760 
			 March 1999 144,530 
			 April 1999 145,560 
			 May 1999 145,730 
			 June 1999 144,410 
			 July 1999 145,990 
			 August 1999 143,560 
			 September 1999 138,050 
			 October 1999 131,360 
			 November 1999 126,800 
			 December 1999 127,700 
			 January 2000 129,470 
			 February 2000 128,730 
			 March 2000 128,350 
			 April 2000 127,090 
			 May 2000 126,120 
			 June 2000 122,550 
			 July 2000 121,980 
			 August 2000 119,350 
			 September 2000 111 ,400 
			 October 2000 106,430 
			 November 2000 103,080 
			 December 2000 103,810 
			 January 2001 105,820 
			 February 2001 104,670 
			 March 2001 103,550 
			 April 2001 102,950 
			 May 2001 102,310 
			 June 2001 99,550 
			 July 2001 100,220 
			 August 2001 97,940 
			 September 2001 94,730 
			 October 2001 91,600 
			 November 2001 89,410 
			 December 2001 90,550 
			 January 2002 92,450 
			 February 2002 94,370 
			 March 2002 96,170 
			 April 2002 97,180 
			 May 2002 98,110 
			 June 2002 96,400 
			 July 2002 97,730 
			 August 2002 96,110 
			 September 2002 92,510 
			 October 2002 89,930 
			 November 2002 87,530 
			 December 2002 88,860 
			 January 2003 92,460 
			 February 2003 92,870 
			 March 2003 94,440 
			 April 2003 94,430 
			 May 2003 95,150 
			 June 2003 94,360 
			 July 2003 96,410 
			 August 2003 95,690 
			 September 2003 92,640 
			 October 2003 88,960 
			 November 2003 87,320 
			 December 2003 88,190 
			 January 2004 90,470 
			 February 2004 90,300 
			 March 2004 90,680 
			 April 2004 90,310 
			 May 2004 89,940 
			 June 2004 87,760 
			 July 2004 87,820 
			 August 2004 86,460 
			 September 2004 82,770 
			 October 2004 78,810 
			 November 2004 77,610 
			 December 2004 78,720 
			 January 2005 80,500 
			 February 2005 81,400 
			 March 2005 82,490 
			 April 2005 83,840 
			 May 2005 84,670 
			 June 2005 83,360 
			 July 2005 85,970 
			 August 2005 86,480 
			 September 2005 83,840 
			 October 2005 82,060 
			 November 2005 81,310 
			 December 2005 83,440 
			 January 2006 86,770 
			 February 2006 88,390 
			 March 2006 91,840 
			 April 2006 93,660 
			 May 2006 95,930 
			 June 2006 95,340 
			 July 2006 97,780 
			 August 2006 97,790 
			 September 2006 93,320 
			 October 2006 90,360 
			 November 2006 88,380 
			  Notes:  1. A person participating on the programme for more than one month will be included in the table for each month that they are participating.  2. Information on participants is only available from July 1998.  3. Latest data is to November 2006.  4. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.   Source:  New Deal Evaluation Database, Information Directorate, DWP.